Got stopped today on the Sidcup bypass and got a right telling off.
I’ll hold my hands up and say yes I was a tad over the speed limit, and yes it was the same officer that had warned me before.
He was most annoyed with me though because I was up on the pegs whilst going a little over the limit but I’m still not sure what law I’m breaking by standing up whilst rolling along.
That’s what I was thinking, OK 75 in a 50 is naughty but can’t quite see how they could add the standing up whilst doing it on a bike that’s designed to be ridden that way
They did one of the great trials riders for that a “few” years back. Despite bringing his Scottish Six Day awards and medal and some newsreel footage to court, he was still found guilty.
Conclusion? The law is an ass.
Mind you, he was just done for “full control”, not being 50% over the posted limit.
When and where was that then? My recent experience of traffic court has been that Magistrates are unwilling to convict unless they’ve been summonsed for an open & shut case. I was recently (2 days before my off) at a court in the Kent/London border area which is used as an overflow court for traffic matters. The person I had reported had got sick of sitting in the traffic on New Years Eve 07/08 and had pulled out of a line of traffic, gone the wrong side of a keep left bollard, through a red light on the wrong side of the road and turned left. I reported him for the red light, the keep left bollard and without due care. When it got to court the CPS decided to only go with without due care as the other offences were a duplication. The defendant agreed entirely with my version of events, but claimed he had done it safely because the lights were obviously stuck. I had said in my evidence that I had checked the lights, they were working, but there was a long red phase for the direction he had come from to assist the traffic on the main road he had turned into. He was found not guilty.