I know that y-e-a-r-s ago 100k on a car was considered in the same way that the sound barrier was - an invisible wall that, once passed, your engine would disintegrate.
My dear long departed old Dad would consider a 75k mileage as far to close to the dreaded 100k and only bought cars that were 50k or under,
Mind you the cars designed in the 60’s couldn’t cope with the new fangled motorways - and apart from Mercedes and VW Beetles ( Japanese cars were not invented then - ask Art and Jet
) they blew up if pushed to do 75mph for more than two hours…
So now it’s 2014 - fuel , oil, bearings, tolerances are light years away in sophistication than in my Uncles Hillman Minx ( which decided to throw it’s pistons on the M1 - not once but twice!) .
We shouldn’t worry about high mileages ( or should we ).
Here’s why I ask.
Eldest daughter about to get a driving licence.
I have identified a Mini One as the best car ( and she LOVES em )
I have found out you need to buy one with a Getrag gearbox ( the early pre-July 2004 gearboxes are too fragile)
But the mileages on the 2004 or 2005 models are obviously high ( in my mind )
The normal mileages are from 70k to 85k with loads at 90k and a fair few at 100k plus.
She has seen a nice one locally with 108k on the clock ( me Dada would revolve in his grave)
I’m getting cold feet - it is a lot cheaper than a 70k to reflect mileage and has been well serviced but I’m thinking…
a) Will it blow up in another 500 miles?
b) all the components , the wheel bearings, gearbox, brake mountings…bloody hell even the paintwork has been subject to LOADS of wear, vibration and wind blast - will something give?
and
c) If we b uy and keep it a few years will anyone want to buy it with 140k on the clock or will it only be good for scrap???
So guys and gals whaddya think? am I being silly?

