I really don’t understand why so many people are disregarding the safety of Box Helmets, they are only cheap due to the lack of quality and comfort, not safety.
Firstly, every BOX helmet passes the ECE22.05 Specification which involves various tests, you you know you are 100% safe if you hit your head against a wall at 16mph.
ECE testing methodology can be found here: http://www.reevu.cz/down/ece2205.pdf
You are probably thinking, 16mph? is that all? Yes, that’s all - which is why our government funded and introduced SHARP testing, they perform rigorous testing at higher speeds and at various angles of the helmet.
BOX has three helmets which attain a 4 Star safety rating, BX1, BX2 and BX5 Hurricane. Arai only have 2 helmets which get 4+ Stars, unsurprisingly a lot of people were pissed off and called the SHARP tests a farce, how would you feel if you spent £300+ on a helmet believing that old rule of thumb that the more you spend on your helmet the safer it is?
The reason most of the Arai helmets attained such poor ratings was because they failed all of the side impact tests on the majority of their helmets - this prompted Arai to release a statement on their website criticising the SHARP testing, Arai stated that the majority of accidents rarely end up with the rider making contact on the side of their helmet, which is true…WHEN YOU ARE ON A TRACK…which is where Arai got their accident data from, the TRACK, not the road where you have to deal with cars, curbs, lampposts etc. Arai stated that in order to reduce the weight of the helmet they reduced the protection to the sides of the helmet where it is not critical.
SHARP testing however gets their data from road accidents, not track accidents so they test the sides of the helmet.
Its a shame more people aren’t aware of this, it would force Arai to start constructing helmets for the road, not just the track.
I own a Shoei Qwest BTW.