Theresa May should never be allowed to become the next pm
She is a nasty price of work
It may go against your moral and social thinking, but become a member of the Conservative party. Currently there are about 100,000 members. It's those members who vote for the party leader. I'm joining just to vote against Boris.It does go against my morals, but what a brilliant idea.This is basically how Jeremy Corban got in. A bunch of students signed up and voted for him.
It’s a couple of quid a month. After the vote in October, cancel your membership.
ANNE ROBINSON…
Sacha Baron Cohen as his alter ego Ali G
Compared to the probable candidates, Borat would be a sensible choice. If nothing else he’d command more international respect…
Chuck Norris 😎Ha ha - Love it!He gets shit done
Big_D
James O’Brien from LBC 97.3FM http://www.lbc.co.uk/ . He’s an incredibly straight forward guy, who can have his opinion turned when presented with different scenarios/facts. He’s on weekdays, from 10am to 1pm.
Definitely NEVER Theresa May. She’s starving the police force of money, and trying to privitise it, as her husband owns GS4.
If that’s true then it’s a massive conflict of interest.
Much as I dislike the woman, a bit of googling shows there’s no substance to it. Apparently it’s just another plod misinformation rumour.
its roughly true& according to the people in Westminster who decideIf that’s true then it’s a massive conflict of interest.
CBR500R commuter
its not a conflict go figure
news article from 6 years ago about the pig shagger: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8641552.stm wonder if he still remembers that
http://policehour.co.uk/2015/11/company-part-owned-by-theresa-mays-husband-set-to-save-police-over-1-billion-a-year/its roughly true& according to the people in Westminster who decideIf that’s true then it’s a massive conflict of interest.
CBR500R commuterits not a conflict go figure
Wise
Could Theresa May’s Husband have shares in a company offering police privatisation?. The simple answer is ‘No’. We reported 48 hours ago that May’s Husband had shares in a company offering privatisation. A number of sources told us he did.
But we have been requested to remove the original article with a spokesman confirming ‘Mays Husband does not hold shares’. It was kindly requested that we then removed the article. It was either that or we could have landed ourselves in court over the matter.
So the Official note is May’s Husband does not have shares in a private policing company. It takes a lot to say we got it wrong, We always verify the content of our news before we hit the publish we believed we were right ‘But we got it wrong’. Lets relax and get back to the matter of Police Privatisation.
news article from 6 years ago about the pig shagger: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8641552.stm wonder if he still remembers that me_groovyIt doesn't really matter, he doesn't get to make the rules.
His profession is listed as a banker & its one of "his company's" that is a major shareholder of G4Shttp://policehour.co.uk/2015/11/company-part-owned-by-theresa-mays-husband-set-to-save-police-over-1-billion-a-year/its roughly true& according to the people in Westminster who decideIf that’s true then it’s a massive conflict of interest.
CBR500R commuterits not a conflict go figure
WiseCould Theresa May’s Husband have shares in a company offering police privatisation?. The simple answer is ‘No’. We reported 48 hours ago that May’s Husband had shares in a company offering privatisation. A number of sources told us he did.
But we have been requested to remove the original article with a spokesman confirming ‘Mays Husband does not hold shares’. It was kindly requested that we then removed the article. It was either that or we could have landed ourselves in court over the matter.
So the Official note is May’s Husband does not have shares in a private policing company. It takes a lot to say we got it wrong, We always verify the content of our news before we hit the publish we believed we were right ‘But we got it wrong’. Lets relax and get back to the matter of Police Privatisation.
Pat
what makes it harder is the fact his company’s just so happen to be offshore & had to trace
there was enough information about it from loads of different sources & it was report to one of the commons committees
for a reason only know to google & the rest of the search engines all the information was omitted under the EU Right to be Forgotten Laws to scrub him and his business
So he’s gone from owning G4S to now working as a banker for an unnamed bank that owns a major shareholding in G4S…
And conveniently no-one can prove any of this 'cos big bad google have hidden all the evidence away so no-one can find it, despite the right to be forgotten law only restricting access to searches from within Europe.
Well that sounds far more likely than the Plod Federation misinformation & propaganda unit in action again 'cos someone’s crossed them.
The G4S story was circulating about 4 years ago, and it got buried then !
Teresa may has no balls and I’m not talking just because she is a woman
So he's gone from owning G4S to now working as a banker for an unnamed bank that owns a major shareholding in G4S....it has nothing to do with the police federationAnd conveniently no-one can prove any of this 'cos big bad google have hidden all the evidence away so no-one can find it, despite the right to be forgotten law only restricting access to searches from within Europe.
Well that sounds far more likely than the Plod Federation misinformation & propaganda unit in action again 'cos someone’s crossed them.
Pat
it was after the fiasco with the Olympics where the government decided to drop the army in it & cancel there leave so they could do the work GAS was paid to do but failed
& the dirt was dug up then & questions was asked then denied
