If they bring in average salary pensions, instead of final salary pensions, will they allow for inflation somehow? Thirty years ago, I was earning just over £1 per hour. Allowing for inflation, I’m probably earning about the same now!
Since joining this local authority fire & rescue service, nearly twenty years ago, I have paid 11% of my wages into the firefighter’s pension scheme. I am planning on doing that until I have worked thirty years; I will then be sixty years old.
It is only recently, with the age discrimination laws, that firefighters have been able to work beyond the age of 55. I am going to need to keep myself very fit in order to stick with my plan.
The firefighter’s pension scheme has never been an invested fund. Since it was created, the money that was paid in by working firefighters was paid out to the retired firefighters. In the early days of the scheme this suited the employers well because retired firefighters would usually be dead very soon after retiring, if they even lasted that long. There were more payers than payees and the scheme was making a profit.
This profit (a proportion of our wages/pensions) was used by the employers to build new fire stations and buy new equipment.
These new fire stations are now old fire stations and in need of renovation or replacement. However, where fire stations are now being relocated to major road junctions to replace the old city (or town) centre stations, and those city centre sites are being sold to developers, are the massive profits from these sales coming back into our pension scheme?
You can guess the answer.
They have already messed up our pension scheme enough. It is still a carrot (as someone has astutely posted), which keeps us in the job but that carrot is in danger of becoming rotten.
I, for one, will vote yes to strike over my pension if they come for it.