It has been touted before, but I don’t think Criminal Cases really lend themselves to this sort of thing.
It is one thing to have it in the Supreme Court where Judges will give a reasoned judgment, however, in the Crown Court you will end up with “snippets” of the case, which will not explain anything.
A lot of Judges have taken stick over the years, some rightfully, for the things they have said or the sentences they have passed, and this has usually been explained by the fact that we get to see little more than the sentence, we have no context for that sentence other than the headline of the crime, this creates a distorted view of the process.
I doubt many people will sit through an entire Crown Court case, which will inevitably include many hours of legal argument which will only be even slightly interesting to those in the profession.
What people will watch is the Jury giving their verdict and the Judge passing sentence (if it happens on the same occasion which it does not always).
Can you imagine watching a Judge summing up for 3 and a half days? I have read a Judge’s summing up which took exactly that long and I can tell you, from the point of view of someone who was working on that case (Innocence Project) it was laborious.
Look, I love the law, I really do, and I want to be a criminal barrister, but even I ended up listening to Judges summing up in the Crown Court thinking to myself, my god the Jury must be either bored rigid, or just confused as hell at this stage.
Once you start putting in bad character directions, whether a confession is admissible and if it is directions as to what weight it should be given, whether inferences should be drawn from silence at the police station or silence in the court room, plus the many other directions that Crown Court Judges have to give as a standard for many of the criminal cases they deal with, I think that most people will be both confused and bored by watching.
Therefore, people will simply watch the interesting bits and gain no further understanding of the case, which will lead to the same problems we have with the reporting of cases at the moment. Headline factors, taken out of context, with no real understanding of the case or the people involved and people generally feeling upset and let down by the justice system.