does that include a free bat!??!
:hehe:
Hmmm, bigger cans cost more to maintain. Over to you, Henry.
Don’t shop at M&S then, treat your boobs to something nicer 
Well i reckon my Double D’s are worth it 
Size is not guarantee of quality. I prefer them natural as opposed to saline, silicone, or gel degraded.
Small, medium, large or blooooody 'ell!!! As long as they are natural don’t care.
Some of the arguments do have merit, larger bras, more material and resources to manufacture but why does it not apply to all clothes. Never really thought at it before, but why are a pair of jeans for a skinny bloke the same price as a guy who warps gravitational field in his local environment?
define ‘natural’…“unaltered since birth”? “unaugmented since birth”? “all organic content”?
lol…
Does that also includes Tug`s man boobs.
natural, as nature intended, with unnessacary surgical intervention (ie breast augmentation, breast reduction is fine, as a girl I was at uni with had to have 5KG of tissue removed due to weight of her boobs causing her upper spine to deform).
Dunno, tell you what John, feel them up and reported back to the quality. 
Kev i don`t think you should be on this thread seeing you have an obsession with boobs.
ah - that’s ok then…
Being obsessive just means that I am the best person for the job.
What sort of job do you mean when you are thinking about boobs Kev.
ive just realised what you said!
Opps, there is a downside to drinking beer in the office. Always read what you have written. Makes for laugh though. :DBut you understood the what I was trying to say. But she did have big boobs, they removed 5KG of breat tissue, and that was a 40% reduction.
[quote]
Kevsta (11/07/2008)
aha…but did YOU understand what I was trying to say… because i understand EXACTLY what you mean…
Well you are a bit of a tart Kev.