Basic anatomy 'baffles Britons'

Basic anatomy ‘baffles Britons’

See answers below Many people in the UK are unable to identify the location of their major organs, a study suggests. A team at King’s College London found public understanding of basic anatomy has not improved since a similar survey was conducted 40 years ago.

Less than 50% of the more than 700 people surveyed could correctly place the heart, BMC Family Practice says.

Under one-third could place the lungs in their correct location, but more than 85% got the intestines right.

There are concerns that a poor grasp of anatomy could potentially compromise patient care.

The researchers asked more than 700 people to look at outlines of both a male and female body and identify which of several shaded areas was a particular organ.

Those asked included apparently healthy members of the public and then people undergoing treatment for a problem that affected specific organs.

Even those for whom the organ was particularly relevant often performed poorly - more than half of those with renal problems did not correctly identify the kidneys.

Fewer than 30% of the general population were able to do so.

But liver patients did better, with 75.3% identifying the organ compared with 46% of the general population.

The researchers said they had aimed to update a similar piece of research carried out in 1970, in which just over half of all the questions were correctly answered.

But with an average of 52.5% correctly answered, the results have barely changed.

“We thought that the improvements in education seen since then, coupled with an increased media focus on medical and health-related topics and growing access to the internet as a source of medical information, might have led to an increase in patients’ anatomical knowledge,” said lead researcher John Weinman.

“As it turns out, there has been no significant improvement in the intervening years.”

There was little difference between men and women, although women did perform better when a female body image was used.

Unsurprisingly, the better educated identified more organs correctly.

Communication concerns

The researchers said their findings did raise concerns about doctor-patient communication and possibly therefore the quality of care.

Don Redding, head of policy at the Picker Institute Europe, a patient research group, agreed.

"There is a real problem with health literacy - people’s ability to understand and process health information - which this study is indicative of.

"It really does matter, particularly as we look ahead to an NHS where resources are ever tighter.

"If people are going to use the NHS in an effective way they need to be able to communicate and understand what is said to them - this way we avoid repeat referrals, unnecessary hospitalisations.

“Everyone involved has to think harder about how to engage people in their own health - it’s the only way.”

Ellen Mason, from the British Heart Foundation, said: "Ideally the public would have a better knowledge of the location of their major body organs than this study suggests.

"This would hopefully produce a more meaningful dialogue with their doctor when something goes wrong with one of these organs.

“However, it is ultimately more important to know how to look after your heart than where it is in your body.”

Answers: Heart - C, Kidneys - D, Pancreas - B

On what basis?

Surely nobody will visit a qualified medical professional, be it GP/A&E or first aider at work and say “I’ve got a really sore shoulder - I think I did it when I was picking up a heavy box” and be told in reply “Nothing to worry about - it’s a simple case of syphallis - get yourself some antibiotics and you’ll be right as rain”

Ooooh a bit harsh Mr C. Maybe Sid put it on here to remind us where our bits that need extra protection are ? :slight_smile:

Oh no not at all - I wasn’t having a dig at Sid in the slightest … just sometimes tabloid journalism sneaks into reports by, in this instance, an educational institution … and it makes me question the authenticity/relevance of the rest of the report …I thought it an interesting read regardless … but if you have a pain in your chest … it doesn’t matter if you think your heart is in your ribcage or your left leg … so long as the professionals know what they are doing … how on God’s green earth will “patient care be compromised”

It can also be read as “If patients have half a clue where their vitals are they might go to the Dr when something hurts instead of leaving it until it is too late or more difficult to treat” - often happens too.

I’m in two minds as to whether to comment on this - but my heart’s not in it. . . :smiley:

And I haven’t got the kidney for an argument. . . :smiley:

In fact, you could say i’m lacking in spleen. . . (sigh). . .

bum bum :stuck_out_tongue:

Yeah a mate of mine had ‘cramp in lower abs’

It was only cause he went on an online medical site to look it up he realised it might be his appendix. Went to hospital, and it had burst. Apparently could have been very bad just hours later. So…knowing where your appendix is, you might go ‘hmm, my appendix hurts, better go to hospital’

:stuck_out_tongue:

I thought The Pancreas was next to Kings Cross:w00t: