New Site: Got love or feedback for us? Email us!

Sharp Motorcycle Test Results

Published by Tasha Crook
03 July 2008, 19:46
4 Comments
Story Tags
The UK Department of Transport is now providing star ratings for motorcycle helmets, in a bid to improve safety and offer the buyer a rough idea of each product's protective qualities.

Freelance motorcycle journalist Alastair Walker reports...


Most UK bikers don't really known how motorcycle helmets are designed, manufactured and tested. Once there were BSI standards, now we have the UN ECE 22.05 tests, but many riders still make a judgement by asking other bikers for recommendations, or assess the overall construction, comfort and fit, when trying lids on in a shop.

But all that is changing as the UK government backed SHARP ( Safety Helmet Assessment Ratings Programme ) comes onstream in 2008, offering ratings from one to five stars for most popular biking lids. The idea is to give consumers an idea of the potential protective qualities a helmet might have, with one star at the lower end, and five stars being the top rating.

The initial DoT SHARP results are suprising, as some helmets from top brands like Arai, Shoei and AGV only made three stars, whilst budget brands like Nitro or Lazer were rated five out of five in the SHARP tests. All of which begs the question; what testing methods are they using exactly, and is a cheap £50 helmet as good as an expensive £300 plus item?

SHARP tests are designed to log the effects of a specific impact of between 6.5 and 8.5 metres per second on specially selected points of the helmet's outer shell - both head-on, and a simulated glancing blow. The impact speed is slightly higher than the existing ECE 22.05 regulations, but SHARP don't do any testing on the chinbar section of the lid, or do a repeated impact on one area - like Arai do in their own factory tests for example.

Ferry Brouwer, who has spent 27 years with Arai Europe commented;


" The SHARP ratings are supposed to save 50 lives per year, a good aim, which we agree with of course. But the new tests do not go far enough. SHARP do not look at the methods of construction, a manufacturer's track record in racing accidents say, nor do they use repeated, or random impacts.

"In the USA the Snell Foundation do random impact point testing for example, and by NOT telling manufacturers which points will be tested it prevents makers from strengthening particular areas on the helmet shell. Arai also believe that a penetration test of the shell is crucial, as no two motorcycle accidents are the same and such incidents can happen sadly."

Watching the Arai testing rig drop helmets onto solid posts, suffer the penetration test, and learning how important it is to keep the helmet's inner EPS layer free from severe temperature changes, human sweat, dirt from gloves, or damage from placing your bike keys inside your lid, was an education.

For example, did you know that the inner polystyrene lining degrades in its protective qualities by around 3-5% per year, and sweat may accelerate that decline in the EPS layer's impact dissipation? So the less your head sweats in hot weather the longer that inner lining will keep doing its job. Fact is, in the real world, the performance of the helmet's air vents in hot weather matters - your head needs to stay cool.

There are plenty of aspects of motorcycle helmet design and manufacture which are still not tested by SHARP and all UK bikers would surely benefit from the most rigorous, in-depth and random, lab-based testing regime that can be done at a reasonable cost by the governement.

Arai offer the following information and tips to any biker looking to buy a new helmet;

  • Check the fit carefully. It should be snug, but not uncomfortably tight, with little up and down, or side-to-side movement when worn.
  • The `D ring' type chinstrap fastening offers the most accurate adjustment to an individual head, rather than the `seat belt' type catches some manufacturers use. A helmet has to stay on your head in an accident to save your life.
  • Because of the gradual reduction of performance in any helmet's inner EPS lining, Arai recommend that motorcycle helmets are replaced every five years depending on use.
  • If you drop your helmet, it may not be seriously damaged. Any UK Arai purchaser can have their Arai helmet inspected by factory trained techicians, for free, at major road race meetings, the TT festival, MotoGP etc.
  • Each Arai helmet is hand-made in Japan and tested at nine separate impact points, with a total of 36 separate impacts utilised in testing - way beyond any current impact testing standard.
Similar Stories
arai : First Wave of New Arai Helmet Designs Arrive in UK
davida helmets : Brits Winner Gets Top Marks For Protection
arai : Arai Introduce New SZ-F Designs For 2010
infinity : Head To Infinity For Helmet Part-Ex Until March 2010
products : Steve Hislop Replica Helmet Now Available
avon : Check your Tyre Pressures Before your First Spring Ride
road safety : Riders Less Likely to Risk Drinking and Riding
safety : Honda Safety Institute Opens its Doors
products : Forma Street Evo Boot
motorcycle safety : New Helmet Safety Ratings Unveiled
acumen : Acumen Portable Asset Protection System - PAPS
tommy hill : R&G Racing Joins Forces with Worx Crescent Suzuki for 2010 Season
r&g : R&G Racing Supports The 2010 Ducati 848 Challenge
products : Wind Tunnel Testing Proves Effectiveness Of Nomad Jacket From Weise
accessories : Extend Your Riding Season with R&G Racing’s Heated Grips
london : Drink Drive in London this Christmas & You'll be Treated Like Any Other Criminal
government : Work to Address Transport Bottleneck in Thames Gateway Gets Underway
industry : MAG News - Advanced Stop L:ines Ruling & Dangerous Driving Law
government : MRTA Calls for New Motorcycle Test to be Deferred
government : New Measures to Tackle Non-UK Drivers Who Break Road Traffic Laws
mcia : New Motorcycle Sales Support Need for Greater Government Recognition within Automotive Sector
industry : Five Years in Prison for Careless Drivers Who Kill
products : Sharp Announces New Safety Ratings for Flip-Front Helmets
arai : 2010 Arai RX7 GP Nicky Hayden Replica
arai : The Craig Jones Arai Sponsorship Award
products : VentureShield™ Helmet Paint Protection Fitted Free
products : Club Infinity - A Rewarding Experience
ama : AMA Superbike Championship presented by Parts Unlimited
products : AGV to Release the Donkey Helmet
competitions : Dainese and AGV Launch the Italian Legendary Tour Contest
agv : Tavullia's Valentino Rossi Becomes AGV Honorary President
safety partners : Dainese To Sponsor 2008 Tourist Trophy as Official Safety Partner
products : Lazer Launches Revolutionary New Motorcycle Helmet in the UK
books : The Enduring Cult of the Café Racer, in all its Ton-Up Glory!
bikers’ classics : Yamaha Stars Roll Back The Years at Spa
events : Official Recognition for the Yamaha Classic Racing Team
products : Arai Announce New Promotion

4 Comments


Leave Your Comment:
» Register now to leave comments! It's free and only takes a few seconds.
 
raceace | 06 August 2008, 10:36
(report) #1
This is totally biased reporting!

Of course a Lazer helmet (or any other brand) can be safer than a £500 Arai. It all depends on the construction and design of the helmet - A Bugatti Veyron may not be the safest car on the planet even if it is hand made and ultra expensive!

You should visit a cross section of manufacturers and see the latest tech they are employing before putting your name to this article. Or at least get their side of the story, remember Bell/Shark/Lazer/AGV/HJC etc, have huge experience to.

Please visit: to make up your own mind.
 
photoboy | 16 September 2008, 03:02
(report) #2
Arai are just sore losers, just shut up and make some safer helmets. How dare you guys blame the test, just because Arai give racers free super helmets (that are nothing like the ones they sell to the public) It has long been know that AGV make the safest helmet in the industry not Arai. This government testing is just the proof of that.... no amount of advertising money and freebees can cover it up. Finally a few tax pounds well spent. Shame on You Arai and London Bikers....how many people have died because they bought an Arai helmet thinking they were buying the safest..... they paid a lot of extra cash for nothing, and paid again when they needed protection......Shame
 
Jay | 16 September 2008, 12:41
(report) #3
It's worth noting that this story came from Arai themselves, hence the bias.
 
alastairw | 24 July 2009, 00:02
(report) #4
Much as I hate to respond to people who hide behind internet names...I will, because I've been riding motorcycles since 1975 and worn, and crashed in, some absolutely crap helmets and some very good ones.

AGV had three star ratings in the initial SHARP tests along with Arai, so the test results don't just adversely affect Arai.

Crucially, a lack of random impact, repeat impact and most importantly, impact tests assessing the long term degrading of the EPS inner shell, would be very, very useful indicators of a helmet's real `safety' level. SHARP need to test EPS layers, because they help prevent brain damage in a crash. It really is that simple.

Here's another reason SHARP is a gimmicky rating system and the USA SNELL Foundation is better manufacturers are not invited to submit helmets for SNELL testing, as they are with SHARP - SNELL buy the lids, then test them. This is what the UK government should do - allowing importers to submit lids for testing encourages rogues to add carbon inserts at the points where they KNOW the impact rig will hit. Not that anyone would stoop so low of course, would they?

`Jay,' yes Arai's UK importer Phoenix Dist paid for me to go and see their helmets - and another leading brand - being bashed on the test rig in Holland. They also paid for journos from MCN, Bike, Ride, TWO and Superbike to attend. Like most other journos in the world's motorcycle press I have received free riding kit, it has never, and will never alter my opinion on which is the best.

For the record then, Arai, Shoei, AGV, Shuberth and Shark have consistently impressed me with well made helmets, which are I feel the best to have. They are more expensive in general than other brands which I regard as indicating they have more care and skill in their manufacture. I would rather crash a Veyron than a Kia, but if you choose the Kia, good luck.

Finally, a head on impact with a solid object at a speed above 30mph will kill most people, regardless of which helmet you are wearing. The brain keeps going until it hits the inside of your skull, so even if your skull is protected from the worst of the impact, your brain swells, bleeds, and then you die. Or live with horrendous brain damage.

Take a look inside some helmets which have large `ventilation' gaps in the EPS lining inside them, then imagine the force of a blow, transmitted via an outer shell, connecting with your brain, just as it floats into your inner skull. Think logically about the way a helmet is made, and you will understand why some work better than others, especially over a period of 3-5 years.

The best reason for wearing any helmet is that many motorcycle accidents often involve a series of glancing blows to the head, as you bounce down the road, once ejected from the saddle. Ask yourself why SHARP does not test a series of blows to one area on any helmet, or any impact to the chinbar on a full face lid, surely the common scenarios in at least 60% of motorcycle crashes on the road?

Could the answer be that the government really doesn't give a *** about bikers, and it costs too much time and money to get some really complex data logged accurately, then translated into meaningful assessments of which helmets are probably going to save your life in a non head-on collision?

Oh yeah, one final point the day I see Rossi or Lorenzo racing around Donny wearing a 30 quid lid, bought from a fairground barker in a tent at the BMF, I'll buy one for my next trackday.



forgotten pwd?